Blue and black text on textures...

If you're looking for mapping help or you reckon you're a mapping guru, post your questions / solutions here

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
Franaticus Satanii
Colour Sergeant
Posts: 84
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2003 5:38 pm
Location: Florida, USA

Blue and black text on textures...

Post by Franaticus Satanii »

Here is a strange question...

I have noticed that some textures have been named using blue text, and others in black. I have also noticed that some (most) textures named with black text do not work well in the map.

Is there a rhyme to this reason? Has anyone else encountered this in their maps?
Murphy's Law:
It is impossible to make anything foolproof because fools are so ingenious.
User avatar
Major Pain
Moderator
Posts: 346
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2003 3:22 pm
Location: Epe, NL
Contact:

Post by Major Pain »

like culled etc? Never mind, you won't see them in MOHAA....i hope :wink:
.MAP Administrator
Image
Franaticus Satanii
Colour Sergeant
Posts: 84
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2003 5:38 pm
Location: Florida, USA

Post by Franaticus Satanii »

They don't have the "culled" written upon the texture image itself.

This is an actual color difference in the color of the text used for the nomenclature attached to the texture in the radiant sdk under any textures pallette...

For example:
[caulk]
____________


| texture box |


____________
The name "caulk" would either be blue or black. The black text named textures do not seem to work with MOH:AA or are quircky in nature.

These textures do not have the "culled" text superimposed upon them.

Any ideas to what is the difference?
Murphy's Law:
It is impossible to make anything foolproof because fools are so ingenious.
Post Reply