Here is a strange question...
I have noticed that some textures have been named using blue text, and others in black. I have also noticed that some (most) textures named with black text do not work well in the map.
Is there a rhyme to this reason? Has anyone else encountered this in their maps?
Blue and black text on textures...
Moderator: Moderators
-
Franaticus Satanii
- Colour Sergeant
- Posts: 84
- Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2003 5:38 pm
- Location: Florida, USA
Blue and black text on textures...
Murphy's Law:
It is impossible to make anything foolproof because fools are so ingenious.
It is impossible to make anything foolproof because fools are so ingenious.
- Major Pain
- Moderator
- Posts: 346
- Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2003 3:22 pm
- Location: Epe, NL
- Contact:
-
Franaticus Satanii
- Colour Sergeant
- Posts: 84
- Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2003 5:38 pm
- Location: Florida, USA
They don't have the "culled" written upon the texture image itself.
This is an actual color difference in the color of the text used for the nomenclature attached to the texture in the radiant sdk under any textures pallette...
For example:
These textures do not have the "culled" text superimposed upon them.
Any ideas to what is the difference?
This is an actual color difference in the color of the text used for the nomenclature attached to the texture in the radiant sdk under any textures pallette...
For example:
The name "caulk" would either be blue or black. The black text named textures do not seem to work with MOH:AA or are quircky in nature.[caulk]
____________
| texture box |
____________
These textures do not have the "culled" text superimposed upon them.
Any ideas to what is the difference?
Murphy's Law:
It is impossible to make anything foolproof because fools are so ingenious.
It is impossible to make anything foolproof because fools are so ingenious.
