Time can be turned back ?

[blue60007]

yeah something like that, also before you disingrate you'd be fried by the radiation equivalant to oh say a million nukes.

[Jack Ruby]

Did you know Black Holes are not totally Black, some kinda particles do get ejected from the hole, its a fact !

Also did you ever know that anti particles have been produced ????

They indeed have but only for fractions of a second, this in itself proves that theres an EXACT DUPLICATE of our universe only its an Anti Universe, meaning all magnetic fields, electromagnetic forces etc are opposite.

Its out there somewhere, the anti universe, where your anti doppelganger is doing exactly what you are doing !

Strange but seems to be true

[blue60007]

Did you know Black Holes are not totally Black, some kinda particles do get ejected from the hole, its a fact !

Also did you ever know that anti particles have been produced ????

They indeed have but only for fractions of a second, this in itself proves that theres an EXACT DUPLICATE of our universe only its an Anti Universe, meaning all magnetic fields, electromagnetic forces etc are opposite.

Its out there somewhere, the anti universe, where your anti doppelganger is doing exactly what you are doing !

Strange but seems to be true

Yep, also another fact is that when a black hole eats another star 98% or so of that star is actually flung into outerspace at ultra high speeds. Unless of course its a head on collision then most of it goes into the hole. But that's not common though, most common is the first thing I said where it "drinks" the star.

Yeah, isn't that in the place where they have a really long tube and they speed particles along at near the speed of light towards each other, then they smack into each other at a collision of nearly twice the speed of light?

[kai0ty]

anti-matter cna be produced but only at miniscule amunts and is as of now impossible to store. anti-matter cannot touch anything, no from of matter (which is everyhting we know except light and heat) this kinda sucks because its a dam powerful thing. and there is a machince like that called a particle accelerator.
Ruby, there is no exact oposite copy of our universe somewhere, sorry.
if u think about it there cant be.
lets assume the big bang theory is correct.
if there were equal amounts of matter and anti-matter created they would both anihilate eachother and we would still have a crap load of nothing. more matter was produced (as far as we know spontaneously) and anihilated a ot of the anti matter seconds after the big bang.
and its not twice the speed of light. matter accelerated ot the speed of light becomes pure energey (hence E=mc^2) so twice that you couldnt collide anything..... it does go fast however and u get to see the z-particles and the antimatter and stuff, but only for a split second cuz we cant control the anti-matter...........yet............

[blue60007]

Particle accelerator, thats it!, thanks

Your right the matter and antimater would annihilate each other but see my therory below,

well the particles arn't actually going twice the speed of light, thats just the force of the impact.

Gravity is very weak! YOu'r thinking what??? Electromagnetic fields are much, much, more powerful. Think about this, a refrigerator magnet, gravity is pulling it down but obivously a tiny tiny amount of magnetic energy is holding it up, much smaller than the amount of gravity.

We live in a 10 dimensional world
Our 3 dimensions are sitting on a 4 th dimension and I think its called a brane or something. Nothing can go into the 4th dimesion except gravitrons. Now this is hard to imagine because our 3 dimensions go on infinitely so how could it sit on anything. A lot of gravitrons are going into this 4 th dimension because of the open space in between planets and such and is not bouncing off of them. But this brane is 2d and goes through our side and is no more than milimeters away from us at any give time. On the other side of this plane, or brane is our parallel or opposite universe, thus making up the 10 dimensions:

3 for our world
1 for our time
2 for the infinite plane
3 for our parallel world
+1 for our parallel time
_____
10 dimensions

Read a better explanation here:
http://www.popsci.com/popsci/science/ar ... 47,00.html

[kai0ty]

gravity is just the attraction between two object, none of it actually gets "lost"
our gravity comes from the sun, and obviously it is pretty strong if it moves all those planets. its all realative actually.
think of it this way (i think i used this example before)
hyrogen bonds are weak as hell, they hold water together and we cna stick our hand right through it.
however on a smaller scale they are able to hold together 3billion lines of DNA in each of our cells!
so really u cant compare gravity like that because when u get objects with sizes in somewhat of a proportion the bond is going to be stronger.

[crunch]

our gravity comes from the sun, and obviously it is pretty strong if it moves all those planets. ......... so really u cant compare gravity like that because when u get objects with sizes in somewhat of a proportion the bond is going to be stronger.

Actually, our gravity does not "come from the sun" The Earth has its own gravity. You are right in saying that gravity is an attraction between two objects. But in this case, the "objects" are you and the earth.

And the effect of gravity diminishes with distance. Therefore the water analogy is not really a good one to use to compare the force of gravity.
Sure, you can put your hand into a lake, and the water moves....but you don't actually break the molecule. If anything, it proves gravity is even weaker, becasue you can move your arm to place into the water.

Here is a quote right out of the article :
Right now, particle physicists have a way to describe the workings of gravity. And while they think this description is useful -- it accurately predicts the outcomes of experiments and the like -- they do not think that it reflects the true physical processes that govern the universe.
The quest is for HOW it works. This delves into the realm of particle physics, which contradicts Einstein's theory of relativity. Although the gravity is not "lost" per se, the force works by "exchanging" particles (in "theory"). I am no physicist, and therefore cannot discredit the claim.

This whole time travel issue is interesting, and some of the "theories" involved stretch the limits of understanding, including the "10 dimension" "theory" (I say theory in quotes because none of this is proven, therefore, by definition, it is not a theory, but a hypothesis)



To be perfectly honest, I would never lend credit to someone who will not back up statements with proof. The JT thing was a good read, and more than a few laughs, but nothing more. It certainly was a good promotion for that book, though. I hope none of you bought it.

[kai0ty]

it does prove that the bond is weak because a strong one wouldnt be broken that easily. hyfrogen doest bond with the water it touches makeing a "double molecule" in laymans terms which is easily broken. however it appears i worded my other post wrong. the gravity comes from the earth, but it is being circled around by the gravity of the sun.