BF2
Moderator: Moderators
i didnt say anything about my pc. My pc can run it fine. i mean the "way u move" is just horrible.
I think it is bluddy buggy and boring, the idea is good but it was hardly fun. modding wise u cud convert it into alot of things but i wud say oonly with a SDK a MDK i cnat see it taking alot of changes.
I think it is bluddy buggy and boring, the idea is good but it was hardly fun. modding wise u cud convert it into alot of things but i wud say oonly with a SDK a MDK i cnat see it taking alot of changes.
- General Death
- Moderator
- Posts: 1116
- Joined: Thu Nov 21, 2002 2:33 am
- Location: NC, USA
- Contact:
After +25 hours of playing it...
For a demo this game is simply amazing. I have not been addicted to a title like this in forever. It really has the best of everything all in one package.
Only big problem/bug atm is the in game server browsers lag. Seeing as ASE will not support this game as you have to have an account to login within BF2, they need to fix this quick. You can still use ASE but cant join from it.
When the tools hit the servers the modding possibilities should be virtually limitless based off of what we have seen of them so far.
For a demo this game is simply amazing. I have not been addicted to a title like this in forever. It really has the best of everything all in one package.
Only big problem/bug atm is the in game server browsers lag. Seeing as ASE will not support this game as you have to have an account to login within BF2, they need to fix this quick. You can still use ASE but cant join from it.
When the tools hit the servers the modding possibilities should be virtually limitless based off of what we have seen of them so far.

-
Rookie One.pl
- Site Admin
- Posts: 2752
- Joined: Fri Jan 31, 2003 7:49 pm
- Location: Nowa Wies Tworoska, Poland
- Contact:
how is it different from the crap they spammed out before?
the originals of this series were...
A) poorly designed
B) featured a vehicle to foot solider ration of 5:1(in favor of umm vehicles)
C) poorly designed
D) featured the worst 'feel' of any shooter ever
E) poorly designed
Dont get me wrong, my friends 13 year old lil brother loved em, but really, what does he know? He just liked flying in the planes and stuff, but overall it was a pretty pathetic 'flight simulator'
basicaly they had a little of everything, and excelled at nothing, so how is this one different? It doesnt seem like thier philosophy has changed.
on another note, if bf2 does turn out to be 'the next great game' or whatever, it will just further illuminate how much they ditched moh, starting around the time of the orignial battlefield games... I mean... I havent heard MOHPA mentioned anywhere in a long long time without the word 'sucks' attached to it. EA doesnt deserve a winner =)
the originals of this series were...
A) poorly designed
B) featured a vehicle to foot solider ration of 5:1(in favor of umm vehicles)
C) poorly designed
D) featured the worst 'feel' of any shooter ever
E) poorly designed
Dont get me wrong, my friends 13 year old lil brother loved em, but really, what does he know? He just liked flying in the planes and stuff, but overall it was a pretty pathetic 'flight simulator'
basicaly they had a little of everything, and excelled at nothing, so how is this one different? It doesnt seem like thier philosophy has changed.
on another note, if bf2 does turn out to be 'the next great game' or whatever, it will just further illuminate how much they ditched moh, starting around the time of the orignial battlefield games... I mean... I havent heard MOHPA mentioned anywhere in a long long time without the word 'sucks' attached to it. EA doesnt deserve a winner =)
When I am king, you will be first against the wall~


I agree, BF1 series was SUCKY beyond anything besides Wolfenstein 3D...
I compared them and this has
better graphics
balanced vehicles
good FPS gameplay (with controls very much like MOH, no leans though, and not as sudden)
Excellent simulation of flight and driving (3 diff perspectives for each vehicle)
Amazing netcode (I can play on servers where i have 180 ping and it works as if i had 100 in MOH)
good kits (each soldier has a special purpose and power, there's no one size fits all like in BF1942)
I could go on and on, put it simply, BF1's idea was cool, but everything else about it sucked. BF2 keeps the idea and design, but balances, improves looks and play, and basically ups everything BF1 didnt have,
I compared them and this has
better graphics
balanced vehicles
good FPS gameplay (with controls very much like MOH, no leans though, and not as sudden)
Excellent simulation of flight and driving (3 diff perspectives for each vehicle)
Amazing netcode (I can play on servers where i have 180 ping and it works as if i had 100 in MOH)
good kits (each soldier has a special purpose and power, there's no one size fits all like in BF1942)
I could go on and on, put it simply, BF1's idea was cool, but everything else about it sucked. BF2 keeps the idea and design, but balances, improves looks and play, and basically ups everything BF1 didnt have,
Moderator
۞
Abyssus pro sapientia
Olympus pro Ignarus
۞
AND STUFF™ © 2006
۞
Abyssus pro sapientia
Olympus pro Ignarus
۞
AND STUFF™ © 2006
-
Rookie One.pl
- Site Admin
- Posts: 2752
- Joined: Fri Jan 31, 2003 7:49 pm
- Location: Nowa Wies Tworoska, Poland
- Contact:
addictive
Well the singleplayer mode in the demo is very addictive. But, There are too many gameplay options for my liking. I thought I had a very good computer and vid card untill this demo came out. It strains my system to its limits.



