Sig Test!

Ophisâ„¢ · Post by **Ophisâ„¢** » Wed Jul 12, 2006 11:25 pm

i... i... well.... i .. erm..... no comment

PKM · Post by **PKM** » Wed Jul 12, 2006 11:27 pm

Snake? wrote:i... i... well.... i .. erm..... no comment

might as well finish your sick sick sick sig and put a couple basketballs somewhere in there, perv.

Tod001 · Post by **Tod001** » Thu Jul 13, 2006 12:19 am

LOL,LOL,LOL,,,,,Man!!!!

No reply is needed and, no offense is inteaded........
Everybody just pickin on ya!

Peace...........

Post by **Rookie One.pl** » Thu Jul 13, 2006 7:46 pm

ROFLMFAO!!!

Now that's embarassing.

j/k

Firefox · Post by **Firefox** » Thu Jul 20, 2006 12:38 am

test...............................

Mj · Post by Mj » Fri Aug 11, 2006 2:41 pm

This better then?

PKM · Post by **PKM** » Fri Aug 11, 2006 3:01 pm

Mj wrote:This better then?

no but this one screams you, sir..

use it, i command you.

Splaetos · Post by **Splaetos** » Mon Oct 23, 2006 10:19 pm

Feedback Please.

lizardkid · Post by **lizardkid** » Mon Oct 23, 2006 11:56 pm

i suggest a wilder background, it's far too tame and i mistook it for a plain sky blue background at first. MAke it interact with the foreground, for instance try layering some of the uh, swooshes, in between the A or O. Or make some formation around the triad.

I'm no artist though, but thats just what appeals to me.

Splaetos · Post by **Splaetos** » Tue Oct 24, 2006 12:18 am

I'm not overly fond of clutter... thanks for the input... im not sure I can see adding anything to the 'background' though... its already 2 layered effects, not counting the double frame. Actualy i put the second layer(which is a simple diber render overlay) to mute the solidness of the underlaying liquid layer.... (it originally looks like the backing of my attached sig, cept the swirl wasnt nearly as pretty.)

hmmm you really think the background is tame?

Ophisâ„¢ · Post by **Ophisâ„¢** » Tue Oct 24, 2006 12:39 am

put it this way i like it better then the one you have now.

Splaetos · Post by **Splaetos** » Tue Oct 24, 2006 1:09 am

I like it better then the oen you have now too =p

the other one is a couple years old.

Ophisâ„¢ · Post by **Ophisâ„¢** » Tue Oct 24, 2006 1:54 am

nah, its not that good.

(lol, i stil need to make one that fits the specs of this forum, my old 'snake girl' one was just abit over. . . )

Ophisâ„¢ · Post by **Ophisâ„¢** » Sat Jul 07, 2007 9:40 am

Hey PKM, look look.. its not philic.

PKM · Post by **PKM** » Sat Jul 07, 2007 2:03 pm

Ophis? wrote:Hey PKM, look look.. its not philic.

true that . but i'll think of something .