Phong Shading....can it be done?

If you're looking for mapping help or you reckon you're a mapping guru, post your questions / solutions here

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
Waylander76
Sergeant Major
Posts: 122
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2005 10:03 am

Phong Shading....can it be done?

Post by Waylander76 »

Hi Guys

Found this on the SplasDamage forums for Wolfenstein Enemey territory and wondered if AA or SH actually supports this?

Original discussion:

http://www.splashdamage.com/index.php?n ... pic&t=3068

Tutorial:

http://simland.planetquake.gamespy.com/ ... ading1.htm

If so would the same basic method be used?

Thanks
jv_map
Site Admin
Posts: 6521
Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2002 2:53 pm
Location: The Netherlands
Contact:

Post by jv_map »

Nope q3map for mohaa doesn't support it, and ydnar's q3map2 doesn't support mohaa :(
Image
Waylander76
Sergeant Major
Posts: 122
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2005 10:03 am

Post by Waylander76 »

So it's the compiler that needs to support it?

Anyone know if ydnar still develops/supports q3map2?
Any contact details for him....can't hurt to ask if he could support MoH :)
Rookie One.pl
Site Admin
Posts: 2752
Joined: Fri Jan 31, 2003 7:49 pm
Location: Nowa Wies Tworoska, Poland
Contact:

Post by Rookie One.pl »

Sure, he works for Splash Damage. I don't think he would do that, though. FAKK2's (and all its derivatives, including MoHAA) BSP format is a bit different from the original Q3 one (for instance, the LOD terrain is an invention of the FAKK2's developers) and its specifications were never released. It wouldn't be an easy task to reverse-engineer it. Oh, well, granted we have the official Q3 BSP specs available for everyone now, it wouldn't be THAT hard to work out the FAKK additions, but I don't think ydnar will pick this up anyway, as he's busy coding Enemy Territory Quake Wars ATM. :)
Admin
Image
Image
Honour guide me.

here's my stuff - inequation.org | here's where I work - thefarm51.com
Waylander76
Sergeant Major
Posts: 122
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2005 10:03 am

Post by Waylander76 »

Ahh...didn't know that :oops:

Would have been a cool feature for MoH....
Rookie One.pl
Site Admin
Posts: 2752
Joined: Fri Jan 31, 2003 7:49 pm
Location: Nowa Wies Tworoska, Poland
Contact:

Post by Rookie One.pl »

Course it would. Probably the reason why EA didn't include it (just like the portal surfaces, sv_pure, download system and some scripting functionalities that would've been really useful). :roll:
Admin
Image
Image
Honour guide me.

here's my stuff - inequation.org | here's where I work - thefarm51.com
jv_map
Site Admin
Posts: 6521
Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2002 2:53 pm
Location: The Netherlands
Contact:

Post by jv_map »

Hell if they would have wanted to include all that they would have had to release the game a week later! :shock:
Image
lizardkid
Windows Zealot
Posts: 3672
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 7:16 pm
Location: Helena MT

Post by lizardkid »

^ hah!

dont blame EA, 2015 is a -really- noob studio. i mean, if they did all that stuff with scripting (spawners, bombers, etc) then you KNOW they don't know what was going on. The only thing the changed in the code, i bet, is the default walk and run speeds, and maybe even the jump height. Barring that, it's all content. And their content was pretty good.
Moderator

۞
Abyssus pro sapientia
Olympus pro Ignarus
۞

AND STUFF™ © 2006
Post Reply