.Map :: MoHAA Mapping

Well if we attack N.Korea the goverment will have my support , as you can tell by my sig.
And as well as more people hating us. the mainstream media loves to go about the world looking for the wacko's who hate and then broadcasting to the public saying that the whole world hates us. And the goverment only runs us cause no group off people large enough can ever get organized to take a stand let alone agree on the same thing to take a stand on.

well if nukes start flying and by strange chance we meet when everything is full of radiation and we are all dying off,i'll remind you that thats the way you wanted it!

i'd rather we not go into another war, i mean it's like we're trying to build up confidence after Vietnam or something, ''hey look we invaded some countries! woo we're powerful'' *insert victory dance here*

still, either them or us right?

LtNeil wrote:well if nukes start flying and by strange chance we meet when everything is full of radiation and we are all dying off,i'll remind you that thats the way you wanted it!

what they got like two nukes and we have 125,000. they'ed be turned into a parking lot of glowing glass if they nuked us.

Besides if we were to attack we should strike first. send in Spec ops to destroy the nukes. you could blow them up without causing the nukes it self to go off cause it works by causing a chain reaction. A conventional explosive charge goes off causing a cone of a cetain element (don't remeber which) to shoot down a tube and strike the core of U-235 or plutonium-238 making causing nuclear fusion that release lots of energy resulting in the explosion.
Like in Armaggedon they couldn't just shoot the bomb to make it go off they had to reactivate it, nuke are very unstable just like comps one part of the motherboard goes and the whole thing dies.. I know about this stuff cause i studied it in high school.
anyway right after the nukes are destroyed , more spec ops could assassinate Kim ill and cronies so there's no one to run the country and the military goes into disary. Then we could probably land at Inchon again.

Well, after looking stupid and aeroghant in Iraq, with the WMD crap. I think it would be best if we sat back and let the UN start this and see how many other countries are concerned about this idiot, and his nukes. Then, if they ask for help, we can respond to that. I dont know where the US government got the idea that we have to be world police, cause that's not a welcome concept ANYWHERE! Hell, we cant take care of our own problems right under our own feet for cryin out loud.

The UN. are you nuts they can't handle anything. Bosnia , Kosavo, Rawanda, need i go on. "You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy[a.k.a. the U.N.]". (star wars).
And just because the liberal media says there aren't any weapons because we haven't found any doesn't mean they weren't there to begin with. we took so long to go into Iraq because the U.N. wanted us to wait a see if Saddam would pay heed to anthor resloution. Like the other 12 they passed he so willing obey [P.S. being sarcastic]. He probably shipped them off to Syria.
He had and used them before.

SADDAM ONLYS KILLS HIS OWN PEOPLE IT'S NONE OF OUR BUSINESS.

SADDAM ONLYS KILLS HIS OWN PEOPLE IT'S NONE OF OUR BUSINESS.

Ouch. i really don't believe that is the 'right' thing to say. Honestly.. Killing is killing. So-damn-insane killed many iraqis. I could drag on but ill leave it at that for the time being...

As for that flash vid.
[sarcasm] Yes, all i see in america is a bunch of protesters holding pickets signs arguing with everything.[/sarcasm]

Hell, he said something about flags and portraits being flown everywhere.. since when did Patriotism become fascism?

It just sounds like a raging liberal bitching about his ideas on what America looks like and whining about (between the lines) if kerry was president things would be different because of his 'plan'. Great. Actually, that reminds me... Kerry went around boasting of this plan of his (when we the people don't really know what this plan actually IS)... that sounds a lot similar to "Communist Russia" and stalin. And even Hitler. Im not trying to say that he and the liberal kerry lovers are the REAL fascists, just saying that its an exaggerated accusation and a sorry attempt to 'spread the word and worry'.

well it's extreme, but you cannot deny America has resemblances to Fascist countries.

Cheetohs wrote:
Ouch. i really don't believe that is the 'right' thing to say. Honestly.. Killing is killing. So-damn-insane killed many iraqis. I could drag on but ill leave it at that for the time being...

What do you mean not the right thing to say. I was talking about how even though we haven't found any WMD's and even if there weren't any WMD's we still should have gone over there. Saddam was murdering his own people by the thousands, that's solid fact, there's no other country in the world that can help the oppresed so what are we suppose to do stand by and watch, It like watching a buch of thugs beat up somebody whose's defenseless and you just stand by and watch even though you're packing a 12 gauge and have the power to stop it. "oh but it's none of my business". thats what i was saying.

And killing is not killing. are you saying that saddam causing genocide is the same as our troops killing the terrorists, (Oh if it's not one group of people dying it's another so way bother ). I sure hope not.

And here's a point to contemplate. Which came first America or fascism. I think it was America so maybe the facisits are copying us just with out the Freedom.

I think although maybe the moral to go to war was right, its the fact that our figureheads, important people, lied to us. Trust in the all important establishment is gone...

what they got like two nukes and we have 125,000

Maybe the world should be invading you then to disarm the many WMD's that are there... Britain is no doubt under the same flag, having no doubt many WMDs of our own. Now lets imagine if the president if the USA went mad, and obtained all the launch codes of whatever you need. Infact lets not

Mj wrote:I think although maybe the moral to go to war was right, its the fact that our figureheads, important people, lied to us. Trust in the all important establishment is gone...

what they got like two nukes and we have 125,000

Maybe the world should be invading you then to disarm the many WMD's that are there... Britain is no doubt under the same flag, having no doubt many WMDs of our own. Now lets imagine if the president if the USA went mad, and obtained all the launch codes of whatever you need. Infact lets not

As I believe they didn't lie Saddam had them he used them against the kurds
and because we waited so long for the U.N. to finish their inspections that were a buch of bull$%#@ he was able to ship them to syria or some other terrorist . and What i ment by them having 2 and us having 125,000 was that they better not fire them on us cause we could wipe them off the map.
And all are nukes aren't in control by a crazy dictator, If the president were to go mad and get the launch codes i sure hope he would be removed, in a hurry. But i seriuolys doubt that all you need aren't launch codes to fire are nukes Infact i know that not all you need.

Mj wrote:

what they got like two nukes and we have 125,000

Maybe the world should be invading you then to disarm the many WMD's that are there... Britain is no doubt under the same flag, having no doubt many WMDs of our own. Now lets imagine if the president if the USA went mad, and obtained all the launch codes of whatever you need. Infact lets not

That is the main reason why we need to worry about our most important constitutional right (to keep and bare arms), cause if not for that right, we easily could see something like that happen. The more our government bans guns, the more there power over the people grows.

ziptie2k2 wrote:

Mj wrote:

what they got like two nukes and we have 125,000

Maybe the world should be invading you then to disarm the many WMD's that are there... Britain is no doubt under the same flag, having no doubt many WMDs of our own. Now lets imagine if the president if the USA went mad, and obtained all the launch codes of whatever you need. Infact lets not

That is the main reason why we need to worry about our most important constitutional right (to keep and bare arms), cause if not for that right, we easily could see something like that happen. The more our government bans guns, the more there power over the people grows.

Amen to that If i want to pack a .45 a damn well should be able to.

make me think of another slogan.

Criminals for Gun Control "We might get hurt on the Job"

you live in Texas dont you?

seriously, jsut because you're packing a handgun r knife does not necissarily mean you're a mad killer. that's a RIGHT, not a privelege... (spelt wrong)

Maybe the world should be invading you then to disarm the many WMD's that are there... Britain is no doubt under the same flag, having no doubt many WMDs of our own. Now lets imagine if the president if the USA went mad, and obtained all the launch codes of whatever you need. Infact lets not

one of the upsides of our government is that no one man can call huge things like that. Saddam had the ability to launch one wherever he pleased if even a grain of dust got in his eye.