.Map :: MoHAA Mapping

Do what you like I just upgraded to a 19 inch monitor

Thank god!

OK, fixed the dynamically wide logo at the top. Stupid IE did not get that it was a link, so I had to tell it explicitly to show the "link mouse cursor"

But if you have trouble with it in any strange browser: please let me know ( tested and approved in Firefox and IE6 ).

Bjarne BZR wrote:OK, fixed the dynamically wide logo at the top. Stupid IE did not get that it was a link, so I had to tell it explicitly to show the "link mouse cursor"

But if you have trouble with it in any strange browser: please let me know ( tested and approved in Firefox and IE6 ).

Looks great here wd

Crap, just tested in my 1600x1200 resolution at school. The bitmaps are now wide enough... fix it tonight.

I kind of find CSS design fun... am I sick?

I think the black borders on the sides should be wider. People with 17-15 inch monitors will not see the same as us who have 20-19 inch monitors. Thier view of our posts will be squashed or have a slide at the bottom of the screen.

My res is set at 1280 x 1024 (19 inch monitor) and there is only about a 1/8 inch border now. Maybe a 768 table width (17 inch monitor) would be better.

Not sure I get what you meam Tom, are you suggesting goin back to a fixed width forum?

As it is now the forum will use any width available ( and I finally fixed the logo bitmap, it will now dynamically space from a widht of around 700 to infinity width ).

tltrude wrote:I think the black borders on the sides should be wider. People with 17-15 inch monitors will not see the same as us who have 20-19 inch monitors. Thier view of our posts will be squashed or have a slide at the bottom of the screen.

My res is set at 1280 x 1024 (19 inch monitor) and there is only about a 1/8 inch border now. Maybe a 768 table width (17 inch monitor) would be better.

It looks great on my 17 inch screen... haven't tried my 15'' yet

I like it, good job guys, the variable width is nice, its filling my 1280 res now, cool