.Map :: MoHAA Mapping

lizardkid wrote:i get it too strafer. but it took some time. but i think it was more twisting words than him actually saying it.

well, no country is perfect Jack, and England is more a 2nd-world country, i mean, look on the bright side! England has the highest exchange rate in the world! you can go anywhere and be a king basically!

I wasn't trying to put down England. Just defending America
I just can't stand when someone blames us for the problems in the world

Thats a good point about the exchange rate, I have lorded it up in many foreign countries for what seemed like peanuts to me

I think I must be just getting to be a mean old bastard

I have family in the USA, I lived there for a while even, I have no complaints about it at all, I loved the place and the people, nothing bad at all to say about it.

That exchange rate thing works there too, came home with about 10 pairs of levis and quite a few pairs of Nike's,

I do get a kick out of M4rine comment about US having the most uncordinated army. When he's British..LOL

About 12,000 trained British troops attacked New Orleans which had about 3000 us troops to defend it, the US won with like 200 deaths compaired to the british losing about 10,000. Thats some real cordination there M4rine!

The US defeated Japan's strongest Naval force as well with their uncordinated ways.

And.....And......And......

So what ur saying is that uncordinated armies usually win.
Ur a riot.

I'm not sure if I'm looking at the same post as you hogleg, but if I am, he didn't say that:

m4rine wrote: USA deserves critisicsm. bullying counrty who have the most uncoordinated army in the world

He said that we are picking on the most uncoordinated army in the world.

I don't know if he said that later, but if you were looking at the second post on here then that's where I got the quote from.

i belive he took it (and me too) to belive it to be like this

"USA deserves critisicsm. it's a bullying counrty who have the most uncoordinated army in the world "

and yo took it to be like

"USA deserves critisicsm. bullying a counrty who have the most uncoordinated army in the world"

but only M4rine knows what hes talking about

hogleg wrote:I do get a kick out of M4rine comment about US having the most uncordinated army. When he's British..LOL

About 12,000 trained British troops attacked New Orleans which had about 3000 us troops to defend it, the US won with like 200 deaths compaired to the british losing about 10,000. Thats some real cordination there M4rine!

The US defeated Japan's strongest Naval force as well with their uncordinated ways.

And.....And......And......

So what ur saying is that uncordinated armies usually win.
Ur a riot.

um.. im talking modern day here. at least we dont go shooting down allied aircraft (recently that is) like you shot down about 5 of ours. and at least we aint overly trigger happy, like so many of your fighter pilots were in Iraq.

m4rine wrote: at least we dont go shooting down allied aircraft (recently that is) like you shot down about 5 of ours. and at least we aint overly trigger happy, like so many of your fighter pilots were in Iraq.

I can guarantee that the British have had friendly fire of their own.

It's not just the U.S. that makes mistakes you know. Or am I wrong? Is your country perfect?

Yeah, Lizardkid, I see what you mean. I guess I read it with the 'a' in the sentence, expecting that seeing how the U.S. doesn't have an uncoordinated army...but you know...m4rine knows all, especially about WW2.

strafer wrote:

m4rine wrote: at least we dont go shooting down allied aircraft (recently that is) like you shot down about 5 of ours. and at least we aint overly trigger happy, like so many of your fighter pilots were in Iraq.

I can guarantee that the British have had friendly fire of their own.

It's not just the U.S. that makes mistakes you know. Or am I wrong? Is your country perfect?

Yeah, Lizardkid, I see what you mean. I guess I read it with the 'a' in the sentence, expecting that seeing how the U.S. doesn't have an uncoordinated army...but you know...m4rine knows all, especially about WW2.

not in the current wars htough have we? and since when did i say UK was perfect? and about that last comment you can shut your fucken gob, at least i dont ceremonaly take my countries flag up the arse and worship it... and i dont htink that if my countrie fails the world will fail

um.. im talking modern day here. at least we dont go shooting down allied aircraft (recently that is) like you shot down about 5 of ours.

I did not shoot down any airplanes!

Face it, America is the world police. Can't wait to see the new south park movie.

and i dont htink that if my countrie fails the world will fail

If the UK fails the world would not. You are correct.

I love living in America. Is there something wrong with that? Oh right, it's America's fault for every little thing in the world.

hogleg wrote: If the UK fails the world would not. You are correct.

Ahh...free speech...I love being an American.

yes and if USA falls the world will not fall either. and America the worlds police? it thinks and acts as though it is, but what arrogance does it have to think it is their place to police the world? a lot of arrogance is needed. it is the UN's job to police to world, not Americas. this is what i mean, swimming in arrogance

I don't think its arrogance, rather a long term goal thats been in motion for 50 or 60 years to the effect of join us, work with us or pay the price theory.

It might be closer to greed than arrogance!

Yeah, who knows the exact reason why we went to war. And how are we trying to police the world? By invading a country for whatever reason? If we were policing the world, we would have another Hitler on our hands, without the mass killings... Anyway, a lot of the UN supported this decision (including Britain I believe).

what decision are you talking about there, the Iraq war? i wasn't just talking about one decision you know.

Here it is
Team America