.Map :: MoHAA Mapping

Jack Ruby's avatar got me thinkin about this:


The man in the white my best friend meet a couple of years ago.
My dad knew Jack Ruby from a bar on Harry Hinze blvd.
And to top it off my x girlfriend's dad took that picture! ( Bob Jackson).

kinda wierd Straight up.

Thats very interesting Hog, that six degrees of separation thing come to mind.

You know how everyone is meant to have a connection to everyone else within 6 steps.

Why did Mr Ruby do it ? Was he a super patriot or something ?

he was tied to the mob and had to cover up the conspiercy.
they hired assasins from other country's,there was actually 4 shooters,
and only 3 landed there shots.there was actually a witness who seen the gunman on the grassy knowl dressed in police clothes and handed the rifle to a unknown man to take it away.i watched a big ol' thing on it on the history channel.one of the assasins even said himself he has the evidence about the whole thing but no one will get to observe any of it untill he dies,then his lawyer is to release all the info.

I just read Hogs post again, frickin amazing man, connected to 3 of the guys in that famous photo, very cool im impressed

4 shooters Green Beret ? you really think ?

its what this alleged assasin said.

I cant exactly remember how Peter Jennings said it, but it was some thing like this: You take the to mind the Haulocaust, and you say to urself wow it had to take something awfully great and terrible to that, The german empire. Now you take to mind the Kennedy assasination, a wonderfull president who was murdered in the most horrible way, and you say to urself that there is no way it could have been done by one man. Its hard for us (and our nation at the time of the assasination) to accept that a wonderfull president was assasinated by one man, so we want ourselves to believe that there was a conspiracy. I believe he made a great point here.

I know its not exactly the way he put it but im sure you get the point.

When shot in the head bodies sometimes go foward, and sometimes they go backwards. This is a Fact.

I believe that Oswald acted alone, and only wanted all the attention that he could never get in life.

[quote="
I believe that Oswald acted alone, and only wanted all the attention that he could never get in life.[/quote]

he had plenty attention.maybe you should do a little research.he worked for the government.some of his co workers were the ones in on the assasination cover up.watch the entire video of the JFK assasination.right b4 the shooting,the head motorcade officer called the secret service officers back from the front of the car,the secret service agent looked clueless as to why he was called off the motorcade.seconds later,JFK was dead.oswald deffinately didnt have enough clout to or money to pay of the secret service.

oswald was used as a patsy by his co workers at his governmaent job.
byw his job was testing different types of cancer,they was gonna use the fastest growing cancer and try to infect fidel castro.

Good Ol' History channel

Yeah, that's why I posted that. Makes me feel old
When my Dad moved to Dallas in the 50's for Dental school Harry Heinz Blvd was the most popular strip and Ruby's club was one that me Pops went to, He wasn't his best friend just knew him, saw him kind of thing.

And when I was in 6th grade my girlfriend told me that her Dad took that picture of Oswald being shot by Ruby, We looked it up and sure enough, photographed by Bob Jackson. And in her house they had that pic on their wall. He worked for the Times Herald.

I do believe that it was a conspiricy, He might or might not have been the only shooter but I think he was put up to it.

But Ruby I believe acted on his own, he was a mob wanna-be and pro Kennedy. Everyone that knew him said he was outraged over the shooting.

But who knows, just to convenient for the murder to be cleaned up.

I have seen an entire video on the Kennedy assasination. It was hosted by Peter Jenning on the History channel. As i said, he could never get the attention "he wanted" in life. I think you miss interpreted a lot of things on the history channel. a lot of the things you posted, ive never heard about and were "not" on the history channel episode that i watched. I think you should really let what i said sink in. A great and wonderfull man was muredered and its hard for us to accept that it was done by one man. we want to beilive that there had to be a conspiracy for somthing so terrible.

thats how i feel. and about "research", im sure you've been to the national archives. spent hours at the library. held seminars. pfffffff. that was a cheap blow. im sure you only know what you know from the History channel and a few books just like me.

lmao

The History channel is great, I love it but as far as conspiricies go all they can do is surmize and offer pieces of evidence.

I have watched about 30 hours of documentaries on the subject , so some of those are wrong. Who's to say that the History channels version is the right one?

seriously, one man took out 7 people and got away each time. not only was he frickin good shot, but he was smart enough to get away 7 times i admire his resourcefullness but dont get the idea behind it.

know who i mean? yea, that crazy sniper.

so it's not all that improbable that a prezzie not covered in kevlar can be killed by a man with his gun. Secret Service or not.

i cant believe how they say oswald shot him,but he was high in a building.there was clearly a bullet hole in his windshield to the side of the rear view mirror.oswalds bullet would of went out the bottom of the car near the engine.this windshield of removed and disposed of so no one could investigate.

i guess its one of them things well never know